Pressure-induced new chemistry
Lin Jianyan, Du Xin, Yang Guochun
Centre for Advanced Optoelectronic Functional Materials Research and Key Laboratory for UV Light-Emitting Materials and Technology of Ministry of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: yanggc468@nenu.edu.cn

Abstract

It has long been recognized that the valence electrons of an atom dominate the chemical properties, while the inner-shell electrons or outer empty orbital do not participate in chemical reactions. Pressure, as a fundamental thermodynamic variable, plays an important role in the preparation of new materials. More recently, pressure stabilized a series of unconventional stoichiometric compounds with new oxidation states, in which the inner-shell electrons or outer empty orbital become chemically active. Here, we mainly focus on the recent advances in high-pressure new chemistry including novel chemical bonding and new oxidation state, identified by first-principles swarm intelligence structural search calculations. The aim of this review is to provide an up-to-date research progress on the chemical bonding with inner-shell electrons or outer empty orbital, abnormal interatomic charge transfer, hypervalent compounds, and chemical reactivity of noble gases. Personal outlook on the challenge and opportunity in this field are proposed in the conclusion.

1. Introduction

At ambient conditions, the valence electrons of an atom dominate the chemical properties, rooted in the well-accepted atomic shell structure.[1,2] In general, atoms react with other atoms by losing, obtaining, or sharing their valence electrons. However, the inner-shell electrons or outer empty orbital are not involved in chemical bonding. Thus, the number of the valence electrons of an element is closely related to the oxidation state in its compounds. On the other hand, the preparation of compounds with new oxidation states is a rather attractive topic in condense-mater physics and chemistry.[36] This is because compounds with new oxidation states usually contain new types of chemical bonding and exhibit interesting physical and chemical properties.[610]

Pressure, like temperature and volume, is a basic thermodynamic parameter, but it exhibits unique advantages in finding new materials[1115] and stabilizing unexpected stoichiometric compounds with new oxidation states.[16,17] This can be attributed to the fact that pressure can shorten the interatomic distance,[18] overcome the reaction barrier,[19,20] rearrange the atomic orbital energy level,[21] and modify the electronegativity.[22] In particular, the chemical properties of elements are strongly correlated with the relative orbital energy levels. Although pressure increases the atomic orbital energy levels, the elevated magnitudes of various elements are different.

High-pressure experiments are expensive. Moreover, many attempts are needed to determine the experimental conditions before obtaining the desirable compounds. However, first-principles structure prediction method has become an alternative way to explore potential experimental conditions and identify new functional materials at high pressures.[2328] For instance, the recent breakthrough in the field of superconductivity was achieved by a direct investigation on a theoretical prediction of compressed solid H2S with remarkable large superconductive transition temperature.[29,30] This method has also been successfully applied to the discovery of new chemical reactions and oxidation states, not accessible at ambient pressure.[3134] Some of the research results break through the understanding of atomic shell structure, and realize the chemical bonding involved in inner-shell electrons or outer space orbital.[3537] Although there have been many important advances in the field of high-pressure new chemistry,[3842] in this review, we mainly focus on the recent progress discovered by first-principles unbiased structure search (CALYPSO) calculations.

2. New oxidation states of gold

Gold (Au) is a magic element in the periodic table and shows unusual physical and chemical properties, mainly originated from the strong relativistic effect.[4346] Its electron configuration is 5d106s1. The extension of 5d orbital results in the high reactivity of 5d electrons and the tendency to form higher oxidation states. The contraction of 6s orbital leads to the high electronegativity comparable to halogen and the obtainment of electrons from the other atoms, showing a negative oxidation state.[44,47] Au has become a rare representative of negative oxidation state among the metal elements. On the other hand, Au compounds with different oxidation states exhibit interesting properties and wide applications. For example, the negative oxidation state of Au leads to a series of exotic properties, such as ferroelectricity, electric polarization, and catalysis.[48] F-rich Au compounds can be used as strong oxidants originated from their large electron affinity.[49] However, the long-desirable target AuF6 has not been reported thus far.[50,51] In the oxidative addition reactions, Au in different oxidation states induces diverse catalytic activity.[5254] Therefore, the investigation of Au oxidation state has always been the most interesting and active fields in chemistry and material.[47,52,55,56]

Lithium (Li) and fluorine (F) have strong inclination to lose and acquire electrons in chemical reactions due to their strong electropositivity and electronegativity, respectively. Once pressure stabilized the Li-rich or F-rich Au compounds, they might show new negative or positive oxidation states. In the Li–Au binary compounds, several of Li-rich aurides (e.g., Li4Au and Li5Au) become stable at megabar pressures.[59] Their common structural feature is the Au-center polyhedrons (Fig. 1(a)). The distance between the two nearest Au atoms is significantly longer than the aurophilic interaction distance, indicating that the interatomic Li–Au interaction is dominant. Bader charge analysis shows that Au gains more than one electron from Li, occupying the 6s + 6p orbitals. Thus, Au in Li-rich aurides ( ) behaves as a 6p-element. More interestingly, the negative oxidation states of Au can be effectively tuned from −1 to −3 (or even higher) by modulating the Li compositions. For F-rich Au compounds, AuF4 and AuF6 were identified under high pressure,[57] exhibiting typical molecular crystal characters (Fig. 1(b)). Thus, the oxidation state of Au can be unambiguously assigned as +4 and +6, respectively. The molecular orbital analysis of AuF4 shows an obvious Au 5d7 electronic configuration, which is consistent with the assignment of the +4 oxidation state in Au. Besides these, two hitherto unknown mixed-valence states of Au have been found in AuO2 (+3 and +5) and AuS (+1 and +3) (Fig. 1(c)).[58] These studies not only provide a controllable method for achieving the diverse oxidation states of Au, but also widen the understanding of Au element.

Fig. 1. (a) Crystal structure of I4/m Li4Au and Cmcm Li5Au at 50 GPa. The Bader charge of Au in various LinAu (n = 1–5) compounds, showing that the negative oxidation state of Au is beyond −3 in Li4Au and Li5Au. (b) Crystal structures of I4/m AuF4 and R-3 AuF6; molecular orbital plots of Au 5d orbitals in I4/m AuF4. Adapted with permission from Ref. [57]. Copyright (2018) American Chemical Society. (c) The two mixed-valence compounds C2/m AuO2 and P-1 AuS. Adapted with permission from Ref. [58]. Copyright (2018) Wiley.
3. New oxidation states of alkali and alkali-earth metal

Alkali metals, with ns1 valence electron configurations, have strong reaction activity and can form ionic compounds with other elements. Thus, for a long time, it has been believed that alkali metals prefer to lose the outermost electron, forming +1 oxidation state,[60] and their core electrons are not involved into chemical bonding. It becomes a huge challenge for alkali metals to form a higher oxidation state.[6163] On the other hand, since the first discovery of alkali metal anions (named alkalides) in the 1970s,[64,65] there has been much interest in obtaining more electrons of alkali metals from other atoms.[66,67] However, the negative oxidation state of alkali metals is limited to −1 at ambient pressure.

Caesium (Cs), with the exception of Fr, is the least electronegative element in alkali metal group. Moreover, its 5p level becomes broadened and even increases to the states around the Fermi level under high pressure.[6872] Miao et al. predicted that Cs can open its inner shell through the reaction with F at high pressures, allowing its 5p electrons to participate in the chemical reaction and exhibiting the oxidation state beyond +1.[36] Cs in CsF2, CsF3, and CsF5 molecular crystals show the formal oxidation states of +2, +3, and +5 (Figs. 2(a) and 2(b)). This is the first example to announce that inner shell electrons can become reactive at high pressures, breaking through the classical understanding that inner-shell electrons cannot participate in chemical bonds.

Fig. 2. (a) CsF3 at 100 GPa in a C2/m structure. (b) CsF5 at 150 GPa in an Fdd2 structure. (c) F- -BaF5 at 200 GPa. (d) LiCs in the CsCl structure at 150 GPa. ELF maps of CsF5 (e) and BaF5 (f).

In an opposite way, Cs obtaining electron from Li, at high pressures, shows a new chemical inclination that is not accessible at ambient conditions. At ambient pressure, Li and Cs only exist in the form of alloys.[73] However, LiCs, Li3Cs, Li4Cs, and Li5Cs become stable intermetallic compounds at high pressures.[74] LiCs is stabilized into a CsCl-type structure (Fig. 2(d)). For other compounds, Cs–Li polyhedrons are connected with each other through face- or vertice-sharing. Intriguingly, Cs can gain more than one electron from Li, and extend its negative oxidation state beyond −1. This is due to the fact that the energy increase of Li 2s is much faster than that of Cs 5d, and eventually reordering them with pressure. This character is favor of the charge transfer from Li 2s to Cs 5d, reducing the total energy and stabilizing the Li–Cs compounds. To be noted, the metastable LiCs phase shows superconductivity with a Tc of 21.4 K at 25 GPa. Its superconductivity comes from the charge transfer from Li 2s to Cs 5d, and from 6s to 5d in Cs, inducing a strong electron–phonon coupling.[75]

Alkali metals can open up the inner electrons at high pressures. It is a natural thought that whether alkaline earth metals have similar properties. However, the electron screening effect on the inner electrons in alkali-earth elements is much stronger than that in alkali elements. As a result, opening up the inner shell of alkali-earth metals might be more difficult with respect to alkali metals.[76] In the periodic table, barium (Ba) is adjacent to Cs, and nonradiative in alkali-earth metal group. Under high pressure, Ba can open up its inert 5p shell through the reaction with F, exhibiting the oxidation states greater than +2 in its F-rich compounds BaF3, BaF4, and BaF5 (Fig. 2(c)).[77] Alkali and alkali-earth metals in their compounds are usually ionic at ambient pressure. Under high pressure, Cs–F bond are covalent (Fig. 2(e)) in Cs–F compounds,[36] whereas Ba–F bond are ionic (Fig. 2(f)).

4. Unusual F-rich compounds

As can be seen above, F is essential in achieving extremely high oxidation states in both transition metals and main group elements.[78] On the other hand, F-rich compounds often exhibit strong oxidating power, serving as fluorinating agents or oxidants.[8,78] For instance, PtF6 can oxidize xenon, producing the first noble gas compound, XePtF6.[79] Thus, design and preparation of F-rich compound are rather important from both fundamental and applicable standpoints.[8082]

Mercury (Hg), one of the post-transition metals, has a fully filled 5d shell. Its typical oxidation state is +2. When Hg reacts with F under high pressure, its 5d electrons become active, forming HgF3 (Fig. 3(a)) and HgF4 (Fig. 3(b)) compounds, showing +3 and +4 oxidation states in Hg.[83] This discovery resolved the long-standing dispute over whether Hg could be included into transition metals.[84] Moreover, the electronic structure analysis shows that HgF3 is metallic and ferromagnetic, resulting from the 5d9 electron configuration of Hg. Notably, the Hg–F bond in HgF4 is covalent.

Fig. 3. Crystal structures of (a) Fm-3m HgF3 at 100 GPa. (b) I4/m HgF4 at 50 GPa. (c) R-3 IrF8 at 200 GPa. Adapted with permission from Ref. [85]. Copyright (2019) American Chemical Society. (d) R-3 IF8 at 300 GPa.

One of the key factors in the formation of F-rich compounds is that the central atoms can provide more valence electrons. Iridium (Ir) contains nine valence electrons (5d76s2), which can be fully utilized in its compounds, showing the highest oxidation state of +9.[6] However, the high oxidation states of Ir are all in its oxides (e.g., [( -O2)IrVIIO2]+, IrVIIIO4, [IrIXO4]+),[6,86] existing in molecular forms. Thus far, the highest known F stoichiometry in Ir fluoride is only IrF6. Very recently, three IrF8 molecular crystals (Fig. 3(c)) have been predicted to be stable at high pressures, which become the first bulk solid containing the +8 oxidation state in Ir.[85] The spatial symmetry of the basic building block in the three IrF8 phases enhances with the increase in the pressure (e.g., dodecahedron square antiprism quasicube). The pressure-induced faster elevation of Ir 5d orbital energy level with respect to F 2p facilitates the charge transfer from Ir 5d to F 2p, reducing the total energy, so that F-rich compounds become stable. Since F-rich compounds are potential oxidants, the oxidizing power of the predicted compounds was evaluated by calculating their electronic affinities. The oxidizing power of the three identified IrF8 phases is close to or exceeds PtF6, a recognized strong oxidant.

As the next transition metal of Ir, platinum (Pt) has one more valence electron than Ir. Thus, we have explored the F-rich compounds of Pt at high pressures in order to obtain a higher F stoichiometry. However, the most F-rich compound is PtF6 up to 300 GPa (Fig. 4(c)). The known PtF4 and PtF6 undergo structural phase transitions (Figs. 4(a) and 4(b)) with pressure. Overall, although Pt, Au, and Hg have more valence electrons than Ir, their most F-rich stoichiometries are PtF6, AuF6, and HgF4. The pressure-induced different increase of their 5d atomic orbital energy levels might be responsible for the observations (Fig. 4(d)).[85]

Fig. 4. (a) PtF4 in C2/m symmetry at 300 GPa. (b) PtF6 in C2/c symmetry at 300 GPa. (c) Phase stabilities of the considered PtFx (x = 1–10) compounds with respect to elemental Pt and F2 solids at 300 GPa. (d) The energy difference between M5d and F 2p orbital at 100 GPa, and the stable F-richest stoichiometry of M (M = Ir, Pt, Au, Hg).

The coordination number of an atom in compound has great effect on the structure and property.[87,88] Thus, hypercoordination has become one of the most active research fields.[8991] Among the halogen elements, except astatine, iodine (I) has the largest atom radius, the weakest electronegativity, and the largest polarizability. These characters might allow more atoms in its coordination sphere. On the other hand, available hypercoordinated I compounds can be applied for the environmentally benign catalysis and the highly selective oxidization.[9294] Up to now, the highest coordination number of I in neutral compound is seven (e.g., IF7).[95] The known anionic octafluoride (IF8) shows square antiprismatic. Pressure-induced stable neutral IF8 molecule having a quasi-cube molecular configuration (Fig. 3(d)), has been identified through swarm intelligence structural search calculations.[37] At ambient pressure, the I 5d orbital level is much higher than that of I 5p, making the hybridization impossible. Under high pressure, the I 5d orbitals in IF8 come down and are split by the cubic ligand field into lower-lying eg and higher-lying t2g sets, so that the hybridization with filled F-centered orbitals becomes possible.[96] Thus, I in IF8 is not only hypercoordinated, but also hypervalent. Moreover, IF8 shows metallic, coming from a hole contribution of F 2p bands. Interestingly, IF8 and IrF8 exhibit similar quasi-cubic structure with the R-3 symmetry.

5. Unexpected chemical activity of noble gases

Noble gases (Ng’s) are the most stable elements due to their closed outer shell. Among them, xenon (Xe) is most likely to be involved in the chemical reactions because of its large atomic size, showing weak binding ability of nuclei to outer electrons. Strong oxidizers with high electron affinity might open the full shell of Xe. As expected, the first noble gas compound, XePtF6, was synthesized in 1962,[79] and three Xe fluorides, XeF2, XeF4, and XeF6, were found in the same year.[9799] On the other hand, it becomes more active and forms various compounds with other atoms at high pressures.

Recent investigation on Xe–F binary compounds has found several of new phases, displaying interesting structural characters under high pressure.[100] Besides the synthesized XeF2, XeF4, and XeF6 at ambient pressure, the other two Xe-rich stoichiometries, such as Xe2F (Fig. 5(a)) and Xe3F2, have been discovered at high pressures. Intriguingly, there appear Xe–Xe covalent bonds in these Xe–F compounds, becoming the first evidence of Ng–Ng bond in compound after in Ng cations (e.g., and .[101103] Moreover, Xe atoms form intercalated graphitic layers in Xe2F.

Fig. 5. Crystal structures of (a) I4/mcm Xe2F at 200 GPa. (b) P-6m2 XeCl4 at 100 GPa. (c) R-3m XeN6 at 150 GPa. (d) Pm-3m XeFe3 at 250 GPa. (e) Pmmn XeNi3 at 250 GPa. (f) P4/mmm LiAr at 160 GPa. (g) I4/mmm CsXe2 at 200 GPa. (h) I4/mmm Mg2Xe at 200 GPa. (i) Ibam (H2O)2He at 300 GPa. (j) Fd-3m He2H2O at 70 GPa. (k) Phase diagram of the helium-water system at high pressures. Adapted with permission from Ref. [111]. Copyright (2019) Nature.

Chlorine (Cl), with a weaker electronegativity than F, can also break the closed shell of Xe. However, the known Xe chloride (XeCl2) cannot be isolated outside a matrix. Under high pressure, a series of Xe–Cl compounds become stable in solid states, such as XeCl, XeCl2, and metastable XeCl4 (Fig. 5(b)).[104] F can oxidize Xe to +6 oxidation state,[99] while Cl only leads to the formation of XeCl4 with +4 oxidation state. The predicted Xe–Cl compounds show diverse electronic properties, ranging from metallicity to semiconducting.

Except for the high electronegative halogen elements, nitrogen (N), which is chemically inert at normal conditions and stabilizes into the N2 molecule, can form compounds with Xe under high pressure. XeN6 has been predicted to be the product of Xe and N2 at megabar pressures ( ).[105] The XeN6 phase (Fig. 5(c)) exhibits intriguing structural characteristics containing the chaired N6 hexagons and 12-fold coordination of Xe bonded with N. It is a semiconductor with a band gap of ∼1.5 eV. XeN6 becomes the potential high energy density material due to its remarkable large energy density of . Unlike the ionic bonds between Xe and F[100] or Cl,[104] Xe–N bond is covalent.

Transition metals, such as iron (Fe) or nickle (Ni), can also react with Xe under high pressure, forming sable compounds of XeFe, XeFe3 (Fig. 5(d)), XeFe5, XeNi3 (Fig. 5(e)), and XeNi5.[106] This breakthrough finding resolves the problem that Xe disappears in the Earth’s core, and provides an opportunity to re-recognize the chemical properties of transition metals. It is well known that transition metals are usually serving as reducing agents and lose their electrons showing positive oxidation states. However, Fe/Ni gains electrons from Xe at high pressures. This is completely different from the understanding of traditional chemical knowledge. The charge transfer from Xe to Fe/Ni under high pressure may be the result of pressure-induced alternation of atomic electronegativity.[22,107]

For alkali metals, the inclination of losing electrons is less likely to be changed. Alkali metal Ng compounds have been investigated under high pressure, such as Cs–Xe[108] and Li–Ar[109] systems. Cs–Xe compounds (Fig. 5(g)) exhibit weak ionicity, in which Xe gains electrons from Cs. The charge transfers become more intriguing in Li–Ar compounds (Fig. 5(f)), as well as alkali earth metal Ng compounds (e.g., Mg–Xe (Fig. 5(h)), Mg–Kr, and Mg–Ar).[110] In these cases, alkali metals transfer electrons not only to Ng’s, but also to interstitial sites forming electrides. Perhaps, it is not easy to add large amount of electrons to Ng’s, so the excess part is localized in the interstitial regions of the crystal.

Finally, the most stable inert gas, helium (He), becomes chemically active at high pressures. Several of stable helium compounds have been obtained through reacting with ionic compounds at high pressures.[112] Intriguingly, the electrons of He atoms do not participate in any chemical bonds, but He atom plays a key role in reducing the strong repulsive Coulomb interactions between the majority ions with the same charge, and decreasing the Madelung energy. Based on the identified compounds and the composition of the Earth’s minerals, a large quantity of He could be stored in the Earth’s lower mantle.

Ng’s can also combine with H2O molecule at high pressures. He was predicted to form compound with H2O.[113] The only stable stoichiometry is (H2O)2He (Figure 5(i)), in which the strong bonding interaction between He and O atoms (denoted as He...O interaction) plays a major role of the stabilization. The He...O interaction originates from the closed-shell of He and O atoms and the strengthen is similar to hydrogen bonding. In (H2O)2He, H2O transfers little charge to He, so that it shows semiconducting property. However, the reactions of Xe and H2O under high pressure and high temperature produces Xe4H12O12.[114] More recently, unusual superionic states have been observed in He–H2O compounds through the reaction of He and H2O under high pressure and high temperature with the aid of machine learning method.[111] This breakthrough finding provides important theoretical evidences for understanding the physical and chemical properties of He at high pressures and the structural evolution of the celestial bodies such as Uranus and Neptune (Figs. 5(j) and 5(k)).[111] More interestingly, He and Ne guests can be trapped by alkali-metal oxide and sulfide under pressure, suggesting a new strategy for gas storage.[115] Moreover, Ng’s can also combine with each other to form stable compounds, such as XeHe2,[116] ArHe2,[117] and NeHe2.[118,119]

6. Conclusions and outlook

Pressure has led to the discovery of numerous unusual chemical reactions, not accessible at ambient pressure. Some of them indicate (i) the inner shell electrons or outer empty orbital participate in the chemical bonding, (ii) abnormal interatomic charge transfer occurs, (iii) noble gases become chemically active and form various kinds of compounds with other elements. Part of the compounds show interesting structures and properties. These findings extend the understanding and cognition of traditional chemistry. However, the research in this field is just beginning. Only a few elements in the periodic table have been studied, and there is still a vast space for exploration. On the other hand, more and more systemic research is needed urgently to explore the reaction mechanism, and establish the basic theory of chemical reaction under high pressure. To be noted, most of these studies are carried out from the standpoint of theoretical calculations. This might originate from some difficulties in high pressure experiments. For instance, strong oxidizing or reducing agents (e.g., F and Li) are harmful to experimental instruments.[35] Thus, more experimental studies are highly demanded. Theory and experiment complement and verify each other, promoting the development of high-pressure new chemistry.

Reference
[1] Pauling L 1960 The Nature of the Chemical Bond Ithaca, NY Cornell University Press
[2] Frenking G Shaik S 2014 The chemical bond: Fundamental aspects of chemical bonding Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA
[3] Crabtree R H 2002 Science 295 288
[4] Goesten M G Rahm M Bickelhaupt F M Hensen E J M 2017 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56 9772
[5] Himmel D Knapp C Patzschke M Riedel S 2010 ChemPhysChem 11 865
[6] Wang G Zhou M Goettel J T Schrobilgen G J Su J Li J Schlöder T Riedel S 2014 Nature 514 475
[7] Karen P McArdle P Takats J 2014 Toward a Comprehensive Definition of Oxidation State (IUPAC Technical Report in Pure Appl. Chem.) 1017
[8] Riedel S Kaupp M 2009 Coord. Chem. Rev. 253 606
[9] Windorff C J Chen G P Cross J N Evans W J Furche F Gaunt A J Janicke M T Kozimor S A Scott B L 2017 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 3970
[10] Zhang Q Hu S Qu H Su J Wang G Lu J Chen M Zhou M Li J 2016 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 6896
[11] McMillan P F 2006 Chem. Soc. Rev. 35 855
[12] Liu H Naumov I I Hoffmann R Ashcroft N W Hemley R J 2017 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114 6990
[13] Drozdov A P Kong P P Minkov V S Besedin S P Kuzovnikov M A Mozaffari S Balicas L Balakirev F F Graf D E Prakapenka V B Greenberg E Knyazev D A Tkacz M Eremets M I 2019 Nature 569 528
[14] Somayazulu M Ahart M Mishra A K Geballe Z M Baldini M Meng Y Struzhkin V V Hemley R J 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 027001
[15] Zurek E Bi T 2019 J. Chem. Phys. 150 050901
[16] Zhang W Oganov A R Goncharov A F Zhu Q Boulfelfel S E Lyakhov A O Stavrou E Somayazulu M Prakapenka V B Konôpková Z 2013 Science 342 1502
[17] Zhu Q Jung D Y Oganov A R Glass C W Gatti C Lyakhov A O 2013 Nat. Chem. 5 61
[18] Zurek E Hoffmann R Ashcroft N W Oganov A R Lyakhov A O 2009 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 17640
[19] Zhang L Wang Y Lv J Ma Y 2017 Nat. Rev. Mater. 2 17005
[20] Crowhurst J C Goncharov A F Sadigh B Evans C L Morrall P G Ferreira J L Nelson A J 2006 Science 311 1275
[21] Miao M S Hoffmann R 2014 Acc. Chem. Res. 47 1311
[22] Rahm M Cammi R Ashcroft N W Hoffmann R 2019 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 10253
[23] Oganov A R Glass C W 2006 J. Chem. Phys. 124 244704
[24] Chris J P Needs R J 2011 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 23 053201
[25] Wang Y Lv J Zhu L Ma Y 2010 Phys. Rev. 82 094116
[26] Curtarolo S Hart G L W Nardelli M B Mingo N Sanvito S Levy O 2013 Nat. Mater. 12 191
[27] Gao G Hoffmann R Ashcroft N W Liu H Bergara A Ma Y 2013 Phys. Rev. 88 184104
[28] Liang X Bergara A Wang L Wen B Zhao Z Zhou X F He J Gao G Tian Y 2019 Phys. Rev. 99 100505
[29] Li Y Hao J Liu H Li Y Ma Y 2014 J. Chem. Phys. 140 174712
[30] Drozdov A P Eremets M I Troyan I A Ksenofontov V Shylin S I 2015 Nature 525 73
[31] Wang H Tse J S Tanaka K Iitaka T Ma Y 2012 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109 6463
[32] Zhu L Wang H Wang Y Lv J Ma Y Cui Q Ma Y Zou G 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 145501
[33] Xie Y Oganov A R Ma Y 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 177005
[34] Dong X Oganov A R Goncharov A F Stavrou E Lobanov S Saleh G Qian G R Zhu Q Gatti C Deringer V L Dronskowski R Zhou X F Prakapenka V B Konôpková Z Popov I A Boldyrev A I Wang H T 2017 Nat. Chem. 9 440
[35] Miao M Botana J Pravica M Sneed D Park C 2017 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 56 05FA10
[36] Miao M S 2013 Nat. Chem. 5 846
[37] Luo D Lv J Peng F Wang Y Yang G Rahm M Ma Y 2019 Chem. Sci. 10 2543
[38] Xia K Gao H Liu C Yuan J Sun J Wang H T Xing D 2018 Sci. Bull. 63 817
[39] Broux T Ubukata H Pickard C J Takeiri F Kobayashi G Kawaguchi S Yonemura M Goto Y Tassel C Kageyama H 2019 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 8717
[40] Binns J Donnelly M E Pe na-Alvarez M Wang M Gregoryanz E Hermann A Dalladay-Simpson P Howie R T 2019 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10 1109
[41] Bykov M Bykova E Aprilis G Glazyrin K Koemets E Chuvashova I Kupenko I McCammon C Mezouar M Prakapenka V Liermann H P Tasnádi F Ponomareva A V Abrikosov I A Dubrovinskaia N Dubrovinsky L 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 2756
[42] Walsh J P S Clarke S M Puggioni D Tamerius A D Meng Y Rondinelli J M Jacobsen S D Freedman D E 2019 Chem. Mater. 31 3083
[43] Pernpointner M Hashmi A S K 2009 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 5 2717
[44] Pyykkö P 2004 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43 4412
[45] Gorin D J Toste F D 2007 Nature 446 395
[46] Bond G C 2002 Catal. Today 72 5
[47] Gimeno M C Laguna A 2003 Gold. Bull. 36 83
[48] Miao M Brgoch J Krishnapriyan A Goldman A Kurzman J A Seshadri R 2013 Inorg. Chem. 52 8183
[49] Wang X Andrews L Willmann K Brosi F Riedel S 2012 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51 10628
[50] Himmel D Riedel S 2007 Inorg. Chem. 46 5338
[51] Koirala P Willis M Kiran B Kandalam A K Jena P 2010 J. Phys. Chem. 114 16018
[52] Wu C Y Horibe T Jacobsen C B Toste F D 2015 Nature 517 449
[53] Zeineddine A Estévez L Mallet-Ladeira S Miqueu K Amgoune A Bourissou D 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 565
[54] Huang L Rudolph M Rominger F Hashmi A S K 2016 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 4808
[55] Jansen M 2008 Chem. Soc. Rev. 37 1826
[56] Mohr F 2004 Gold. Bull. 37 164
[57] Lin J Zhang S Guan W Yang G Ma Y 2018 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 9545
[58] Tang M Zhang Y Li S Wu X Jia Y Yang G 2018 ChemPhysChem 19 2989
[59] Yang G Wang Y Peng F Bergara A Ma Y 2016 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 4046
[60] Dye James L 2015 Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 373 20140174
[61] Moock K Seppelt K 1989 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 28 1676
[62] Asprey L B Margrave J L Silverthorn M E 1961 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 83 2955
[63] Jehoulet C Bard A J 1991 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 30 836
[64] Dye J L Ceraso J M Lok M Barnett B L Tehan F J 1974 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 96 608
[65] Tehan F J Barnett B L Dye J L 1974 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 96 7203
[66] Dye J L 1979 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 18 587
[67] Li Z Yang J Hou J G Zhu Q 2004 Chem. Eur. J. 10 1592
[68] Schwarz U Takemura K Hanfl M Syassen K 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 2711
[69] Takemura K Christensen N E Novikov D L Syassen K Schwarz U Hanfl M 2000 Phys. Rev. 61 14399
[70] Takemura K Minomura S Shimomura O 1982 Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 1772
[71] Shamp A Hooper J Zurek E 2012 Inor. Chem. 51 9333
[72] Hooper J Zurek E 2012 Chem. Eur. J. 18 5013
[73] Desgreniers S Tse J S Matsuoka T Ohishi Y Tse J J 2015 Sci. Adv. 1 e1500669
[74] Botana J Miao M S 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 4861
[75] Schilling J S 2006 High Press. Res. 26 145
[76] Kobrin P H Rosenberg R A Becker U Southworth S Truesdale C M Lindle D W Thornton G White M G Poliakoff E D Shirley D A 1983 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 16 4339
[77] Luo D Wang Y Yang G Ma Y 2018 J. Phys. Chem. 122 12448
[78] Higelin A Riedel S 2017 19 High Oxidation States in Transition Metal Fluorides Modern Synthesis Processes Groult H Leroux F R Tressaud A Elsevier 561
[79] Frenking G 2000 Nature 406 836
[80] Seppelt K 2015 Chem. Rev. 115 1296
[81] Drews T Supeł J Hagenbach A Seppelt K 2006 Inorg. Chem. 45 3782
[82] Craciun R Picone D Long R T Li S Dixon D A Peterson K A Christe K O 2010 Inorg. Chem. 49 1056
[83] Botana J Wang X Hou C Yan D Lin H Ma Y Miao M-s 2015 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 9280
[84] Jensen W B 2003 J. Chem. Edu. 80 952
[85] Lin J Zhao Z Liu C Zhang J Du X Yang G Ma Y 2019 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 5409
[86] Gong Y Zhou M Kaupp M Riedel S 2009 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48 7879
[87] Zhang H Li Y Hou J Tu K Chen Z 2016 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 5644
[88] Yang L M Ganz E Chen Z Wang Z X Schleyer P v R 2015 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 9468
[89] Lipke M C Tilley T D 2014 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 16387
[90] Khan A Foucher D 2016 Coord. Chem. Rev. 312 41
[91] Wang Z X Schleyer P v R 2002 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41 4082
[92] Sreenithya A Patel C Hadad C M Sunoj R B 2017 ACS Catal. 7 4189
[93] Liang H Ciufolini M A 2011 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50 11849
[94] Richardson R D Wirth T 2006 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45 4402
[95] Zhdankin V V 2013 Hypervalent Iodine Chemistry: Preparation, Structure, and Synthetic Applications of Polyvalent Iodine Compounds John Wiley & Sons
[96] Schilter D 2019 Nat. Rev. Chem. 3 65
[97] Hoppe R Dähne W Mattauch H Rödder K M 1962 Angew. Chem. 74 903
[98] Claassen H H Selig H Malm J G 1962 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 84 3593
[99] Weinstock B Weaver E E Knop C P 1966 Inorg. Chem. 5 2189
[100] Peng F Botana J Wang Y Ma Y Miao M 2016 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7 4562
[101] Drews T Seppelt K 1997 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 36 273
[102] Stein L Norris J R Downs A J Minihan A R 1978 J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 502 23
[103] Seidel S Seppelt K van Wüllen C Sun X Y 2007 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46 6717
[104] Zarifi N Liu H Tse J S Zurek E 2018 J. Phys. Chem. 122 2941
[105] Peng F Wang Y Wang H Zhang Y Ma Y 2015 Phys. Rev. 92 094104
[106] Zhu L Liu H Pickard C J Zou G Ma Y 2014 Nat. Chem. 6 644
[107] Connerade J P Dolmatov V K Lakshmi P A 2000 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 33 251
[108] Zhang S Bi H Wei S Wang J Li Q Ma Y 2015 J. Phys. Chem. 119 24996
[109] Li X Hermann A Peng F Lv J Wang Y Wang H Ma Y 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 16675
[110] Miao M-s Wang X-l Brgoch J Spera F Jackson M G Kresse G Lin H-q 2015 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 14122
[111] Liu C Gao H Wang Y Needs R J Pickard C J Sun J Wang H T Xing D 2019 Nat. Phys.
[112] Liu Z Botana J Hermann A Valdez S Zurek E Yan D Lin H-q Miao M-s 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 951
[113] Liu H Yao Y Klug D D 2015 Phys. Rev. 91 014102
[114] Sanloup C Bonev S A Hochlaf M Maynard-Casely H E 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 265501
[115] Gao H Sun J Pickard C J Needs R J 2019 Phys. Rev. Mater. 3 015002
[116] Wang Y Zhang J Liu H Yang G 2015 Chem. Phys. Lett. 640 115
[117] Cazorla C Errandonea D Sola E 2009 Phys. Rev. 80 064105
[118] Loubeyre P Jean-Louis M LeToullec R CharonG érard L 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 178
[119] Chen Q F Cai L C Jing F Q Chen D Q 2005 Chin. Phys. Lett. 22 2005